summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/CONTRIBUTING
blob: 3b4408108a118506326ef56af23ca4e645594bd1 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
Name
       Contributing - instructions for contributing to the project

Synopsis
       Mailing list, patches, lint, style guide, bug reports, and notes

Description
   Mailing list
       The main discussions regarding development of the project, patches,
       bugs, news, doubts, etc. happen on the mailing list.  To send an email
       to the project, send it to both maintainers and CC the mailing list:

           To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
           Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>

       Please CC any relevant developers and mailing lists that may know about
       or be interestend in the discussion.  If your email discusses a feature
       or change, and you know which developers added the feature or made the
       change that your email discusses, please CC them on the email; with
       luck they may review and comment on it.  If you don't know who the
       developers are, you may be able to discover that information from
       mailing list archives or from git(1) logs or logs in other version
       control systems.  Obviously, if you are the developer of the feature
       being discussed in a man-pages email, please identify yourself as such.
       Relevant mailing lists may include:

           Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
           Cc: Glibc <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>

       For other kernel mailing lists and maintainers, check the <MAINTAINERS>
       file in the Linux kernel repository.

       Please don't send HTML email; it will be discarded by the list.

       Archives:
             <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/>
             <https://marc.info/?l=linux-man>

       Subscription:
             Send a message to <majordomo@vger.kernel.org> containing the
             following body:

                 subscribe linux-man

             Unsubscribing:

                 unsubscribe linux-man

             Help:

                 help

   Patches
       If you know how to fix a problem in a manual page (if not, see
       "Reporting bugs" below), then send a patch in an email.

       -  Follow the instructions for sending mail to the mailing list above.

       -  The subject of the email should contain "[patch]" in the subject line.

       The above is the minimum needed so that someone might respond to your
       patch.  If you did that and someone does not respond within a few days,
       then ping the email thread, "replying to all".  Make sure to send it to
       the maintainers in addition to the mailing list.

       To make your patch even more useful, please note the following points:

       -  Write a suitable subject line.  Make sure to mention the name(s) of
          the page(s) being patched.  Example:

             [patch] shmop.2: Add "(void *)" cast to RETURN VALUE

       -  Sign your patch with "Signed-off-by:".  Read about the "Developer's
          Certificate of Origin" at
          <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>.
          When appropriate, other tags documented in that file, such as
          "Reported-by:", "Reviewed-by:", "Acked-by:", and "Suggested-by:" can
          be added to the patch.  The man-pages project also uses a
          "Cowritten-by:" tag with the obvious meaning.  Example:

              Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>

       -  Describe how you obtained the information in your patch.  For
          example, was it:

          -  by reading (or writing) the relevant kernel or (g)libc source
             code?  Please provide a pointer to the following code.

          -  from a commit message in the kernel or (g)libc source code
             repository?  Please provide a commit ID.

          -  by writing a test program?  Send it with the patch, but please
             make sure it's as simple as possible, and provide instructions on
             how to use it and/or a demo run.

          -  from a standards document?  Please name the standard, and quote
             the relevant text.

          -  from other documentation?  Please provide a pointer to that
             documentation.

          -  from a mailing list or online forum?  Please provide a URL if
             possible.

       -  Send patches in diff -u format, inline inside the email message.  If
          you're worried about your mailer breaking the patch, the send it
          both inline and as an attachment.  You may find it useful to employ
          git-send-email(1) and git-format-patch(1).

       -  Where relevant, include source code comments that cite commit hashes
          for relevant kernel or glibc changes:

              .\" commit <40-character-git-hash>

       -  For trivial patches, you can use subject tags:

          -  ffix: Formatting fix.
          -  tfix: Typo fix.
          -  wfix: Minor wording fix.
          -  srcfix: Change to manual page source that doesn't affect output.

          Example:

              [patch] tcp.7: tfix

       -  Send logically separate patches.  For unrelated pages, or for
          logically-separate issues in the same page, send separate emails.

       -  Make patches against the latest version of the manual page.  Use
          git(1) for getting the latest version.

   Lint
       If you plan to patch a manual page, consider running the linters
       configured in the build system, to make sure your change doesn't add
       new warnings.  However, you might still get warnings that are not your
       fault.  To minimize that, do the following steps:

       (1)  Lint first all of the pages, so that make(1) knows that it only
            needs to lint again pages that you will touch.  This example is
            shown with '-j' because it would take a long time (around a couple
            of minutes) to run without parallel execution.

                $ make -ij lint >/dev/null 2>&1

       (2)  Touch the page that you'll edit, and run make(1) again, to see
            which warnings you'll still see from that page that are not your
            fault.

                $ touch man2/membarrier.2  # replace by the page you'll modify
                $ make -k lint

       (3)  Apply your changes, and then run make(1) again.  You can ignore
            warnings that you saw in step (2), but if you see any new ones,
            please fix them if you know how, or at least note them in your
            patch email.

                $ vi man2/membarrier.2  # do your work
                $ make -k lint

       See <INSTALL> for a list of dependencies that this feature requires.
       If you can't meet them all, don't worry; it will still run the linters
       that you have available.

   Style guide
       For a description of the preferred layout of manual pages, as well as
       some style guide notes, see:

           $ man 7 man-pages

       It will also be interesting to consult groff_man(7) and
       groff_man_style(7) for understanding and writing good man(7) source code.

Reporting bugs
       Report bugs to the mailing list, following the instructions above for
       sending mails to the list.  If you can write a patch (see instructions
       for sending patches above), it's preferred.

       If you're unsure if the bug is in the manual page or in the code being
       documented (kernel, glibc, ...), it's best to send the report to both
       at the same time, that is, CC all the mailing lists that may be
       concerned by the report.

       Some distributions (for example Debian) apply patches to the upstream
       manual pages.  If you suspect the bug is in one of those patches,
       report it to your distribution maintainer.

       Send logically separate reports.  For unrelated pages, or for
       logically-separate issues in the same page, send separate emails.

       There's also a bugzilla, but we don't use it as much as the mailing list.

Notes
   External and autogenerated pages
       A few pages come from external sources.  Fixes to the pages should
       really go to the upstream source.

       tzfile(5), zdump(8), and zic(8) come from the tz project
       <https://www.iana.org/time-zones>.

       bpf-helpers(7) is autogenerated from the Linux kernel sources using
       scripts.  See man-pages commits 53666f6c3 and 19c7f7839 for details.

Bugs
   Bugzilla:
       <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?component=man-pages>

See also
       man-pages(7)

       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/contributing.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-man-ml.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/patches.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_code_bugs.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/missing_pages.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/code_of_conduct.html>
       <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst>