[NFC] Move FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger and FoldingSetNodeID::AddPointer definitions to header

Lack of AddInteger/AddPointer inlining slows down NodeEquals/Profile/:operator== calls.
Inlining makes FunctionProtoTypes/PointerTypes/ElaboratedTypes/ParenTypes Profile functions faster
but since NodeEquals is still called indirectly through function pointer from FindNodeOrInsertPos
there is room for further inlining improvements.

Extracted from: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118385

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118610

2 files changed, 27 insertions, 42 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h
index a8707f0ee81e..a4b4e26a494e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h
@@ -323,13 +323,33 @@ public:
     : Bits(Ref.getData(), Ref.getData() + Ref.getSize()) {}
 
   /// Add* - Add various data types to Bit data.
-  void AddPointer(const void *Ptr);
-  void AddInteger(signed I);
-  void AddInteger(unsigned I);
-  void AddInteger(long I);
-  void AddInteger(unsigned long I);
-  void AddInteger(long long I);
-  void AddInteger(unsigned long long I);
+  void AddPointer(const void *Ptr) {
+    // Note: this adds pointers to the hash using sizes and endianness that
+    // depend on the host. It doesn't matter, however, because hashing on
+    // pointer values is inherently unstable. Nothing should depend on the
+    // ordering of nodes in the folding set.
+    static_assert(sizeof(uintptr_t) <= sizeof(unsigned long long),
+                  "unexpected pointer size");
+    AddInteger(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Ptr));
+  }
+  void AddInteger(signed I) { Bits.push_back(I); }
+  void AddInteger(unsigned I) { Bits.push_back(I); }
+  void AddInteger(long I) { AddInteger((unsigned long)I); }
+  void AddInteger(unsigned long I) {
+    if (sizeof(long) == sizeof(int))
+      AddInteger(unsigned(I));
+    else if (sizeof(long) == sizeof(long long)) {
+      AddInteger((unsigned long long)I);
+    } else {
+      llvm_unreachable("unexpected sizeof(long)");
+    }
+  }
+  void AddInteger(long long I) { AddInteger((unsigned long long)I); }
+  void AddInteger(unsigned long long I) {
+    AddInteger(unsigned(I));
+    AddInteger(unsigned(I >> 32));
+  }
+
   void AddBoolean(bool B) { AddInteger(B ? 1U : 0U); }
   void AddString(StringRef String);
   void AddNodeID(const FoldingSetNodeID &ID);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp
index e3d7168305af..f86fe7b7c656 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Support/FoldingSet.cpp
@@ -49,41 +49,6 @@ bool FoldingSetNodeIDRef::operator<(FoldingSetNodeIDRef RHS) const {
 
 /// Add* - Add various data types to Bit data.
 ///
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddPointer(const void *Ptr) {
-  // Note: this adds pointers to the hash using sizes and endianness that
-  // depend on the host. It doesn't matter, however, because hashing on
-  // pointer values is inherently unstable. Nothing should depend on the
-  // ordering of nodes in the folding set.
-  static_assert(sizeof(uintptr_t) <= sizeof(unsigned long long),
-                "unexpected pointer size");
-  AddInteger(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Ptr));
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(signed I) {
-  Bits.push_back(I);
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(unsigned I) {
-  Bits.push_back(I);
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(long I) {
-  AddInteger((unsigned long)I);
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(unsigned long I) {
-  if (sizeof(long) == sizeof(int))
-    AddInteger(unsigned(I));
-  else if (sizeof(long) == sizeof(long long)) {
-    AddInteger((unsigned long long)I);
-  } else {
-    llvm_unreachable("unexpected sizeof(long)");
-  }
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(long long I) {
-  AddInteger((unsigned long long)I);
-}
-void FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(unsigned long long I) {
-  AddInteger(unsigned(I));
-  AddInteger(unsigned(I >> 32));
-}
-
 void FoldingSetNodeID::AddString(StringRef String) {
   unsigned Size =  String.size();